A city street at dusk with people walking past a brightly lit clothing store. The store has large windows displaying various garments, and a glowing blue sign above. The building facade is modern with tall windows.

Content Gap Analysis: How to Find Topics Your Competitors Rank For (and You Don’t)

Currat_Admin
16 Min Read
Disclosure: This website may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. I only recommend products or services that I will personally use and believe will add value to my readers. Your support is appreciated!
- Advertisement -

🎙️ Listen to this post: Content Gap Analysis: How to Find Topics Your Competitors Rank For (and You Don’t)

0:00 / --:--
Ready to play

Picture Google like a high street at night. Your competitors’ pages glow like bright shop signs, pulling people in. Your site might have great stock inside, but a few windows are still dark.

That’s where content gap analysis comes in. In plain terms, it’s finding topics your competitors rank for that you don’t, then turning those missing answers into pages people actually want to read.

This isn’t a one-time tidy-up. Searches change, rivals publish, and Google reshuffles the shelf. Treat content gap analysis like a simple quarterly habit, a short check-in that keeps your site growing without panic.

What a content gap really is, and why it’s easier than it sounds

Close-up of notebook with SEO terms and keywords, highlighting digital marketing strategy.
Photo by Tobias Dziuba

- Advertisement -

A content gap isn’t just “missing keywords”. It’s missing answers.

Someone types a question, a comparison, or a “how do I…” problem. Google picks pages that solve it best. If your site doesn’t have the right page, or your page is weak, your brand stays invisible while others collect the clicks.

Two gaps show up again and again:

  • Keyword gap: you don’t rank at all, but competitors do.
  • Performance gap: you rank, but you’re buried (and they’re in the top spots).

Why does it matter? Because rankings are not only traffic. They’re trust. If a reader sees the same competitor showing up for every question in your niche, that competitor starts to feel like “the safe choice”. That affects sign-ups, leads, and sales even when people don’t click right away.

The mistake is copying what already ranks. If you mirror a competitor’s page word-for-word, you’ll usually lose. Google has already seen it, and readers can smell a rehash. The goal is to be more useful: clearer, fresher, and better shaped to the search intent.

- Advertisement -

Common gaps (easy wins if you act fast):

  • Missing beginner guides (“what is…”, “how to start…”)
  • Missing comparisons (“X vs Y”, “best for…”, “alternatives to…”)
  • Outdated pages (old screenshots, old stats, old process)
  • Weak FAQs (the page hints at answers but never lands them)
  • Thin pages (too short, too vague, too hard to scan)

Keyword gaps vs topic gaps vs quality gaps

A gap can mean different things, and naming it helps you fix it faster.

Keyword gap means competitors rank for a term, and you don’t rank in the top results (or you don’t show at all). This is the easiest gap to spot with SEO tools, and also the easiest to misread. One keyword can map to many intents.

- Advertisement -

Topic gap means you’re missing a whole subtopic or cluster. There’s no page on your site that truly fits what the searcher wants. You might mention it in passing, but you don’t own it.

Quality gap means you have a page, but it’s not good enough to compete. It might be thin, old, hard to read, or aimed at the wrong person. You’re present, but you’re not persuasive.

A simple rule keeps you honest: if the search intent is different, it needs a different page. Don’t force one article to answer three different questions. It reads messy, and it tends to rank poorly.

Find your real SEO competitors (not just business rivals)

Your biggest SEO competitor might not sell what you sell. It might be a publisher, a tools site, or a niche blog that’s built a library of useful answers.

Use this quick method:

  1. Pick 5 to 10 core searches your audience would type (mix “what”, “how”, and “best”).
  2. Search them and note the domains that show up often.
  3. Build a shortlist of 3 to 10 competitors for the analysis.

Be careful with giant sites. News brands and huge marketplaces may show up, but they aren’t always a fair benchmark. They win with authority and scale, not always with better content.

A helpful way to keep your gap list realistic is to split competitors into types:

  • Direct niche sites (closest match to your audience and offer)
  • Publishers (strong content teams, broad coverage)
  • Tool sites (often rank for how-tos, templates, and definitions)

Once you know who you’re really competing with in search, the rest gets simpler.

How to run a content gap analysis step by step (and not drown in data)

The aim is not a giant spreadsheet that makes you tired. The aim is a short list you can act on, then publish pages that win.

If you want a solid reference point on what “gap analysis” includes in modern SEO, this overview from Search Engine Land’s guide to SEO gap analysis is a useful read, even if your workflow is tool-agnostic.

Here’s a workflow you can complete in one sitting:

  1. Set one clear goal.
  2. Pull a list of your main URLs (a quick inventory).
  3. Run a competitor content gap report (using your preferred toolset).
  4. Filter hard.
  5. Group keywords into topic clusters.
  6. Map each cluster to a page and an intent.
  7. Decide create vs update.
  8. Turn it into a 30-day publishing plan.

The win comes from the filters and grouping. That’s where “noise” becomes a real plan.

Start with a tight goal and a short content inventory

If your goal is fuzzy, your gap list will be fuzzy too. Pick one that you can measure.

Good goals sound like this:

  • “Grow organic traffic to our SEO guides section.”
  • “Increase leads from our ‘solutions’ pages by supporting them with problem-solving content.”
  • “Build authority in one niche topic over the next quarter.”

Next, list your existing pages fast. You can export from your CMS, use a sitemap, or pull landing pages from analytics. Don’t overthink it. You just need enough to see what you already have.

Then add lightweight tags. A simple approach:

  • Topic: what the page is about (one phrase)
  • Intent: learn, compare, buy, help
  • Freshness: new, OK, needs update

This tagging step feels boring, but it saves you from a common trap: making new pages for things you already cover (and splitting your rankings in half).

Run a competitor gap report, then filter to the few that matter

Most content gap tools work the same way. You enter your domain and competitor domains, and the tool returns keywords where they rank and you don’t (or where they rank much higher).

If you want examples of how different platforms frame the process, you can compare Semrush’s content gap analysis walkthrough with Surfer’s content gap analysis steps. They approach the same idea from slightly different angles, which can help you sanity-check your own method.

Filtering is where you stop wasting time. Practical filters that work in almost any niche:

  • You rank nowhere (true gaps).
  • They’re top 3, you’re past page 2 (performance gaps that can be worth chasing).
  • Intent match (the keyword should suit what your site can offer).
  • Sensible difficulty (be realistic for your domain’s strength).
  • Clear business value (it should help your audience move closer to a decision).

A warning that saves weeks: don’t chase big-volume terms that don’t fit your site. High volume looks tempting, like a flashy billboard. But if the query is for a different audience, you’ll draw the wrong crowd, and they’ll bounce.

Use a simple stop rule: once you have 20 to 40 opportunities per topic area, pause. That’s enough to plan and ship. More than that often becomes a folder you never open again.

If you use Ahrefs, it can help to understand how its tool defines the subtraction step. This short explainer on Ahrefs Content Gap and the matching help doc on using Content Gap for competitor keyword ideas give the clearest picture of what the tool is doing behind the scenes.

Group keywords into topic clusters, then map each to one page

A gap report spits out lots of keywords that sound different but mean the same thing. Publishing ten near-duplicate posts is like putting ten shop signs in the same window. It confuses people, and it confuses Google.

Instead, group keywords into clusters based on intent and meaning. You’re trying to turn “keyword fragments” into one strong idea.

Think in two layers:

Pillar page: the main guide that answers the big question properly.
Supporting pages: smaller pages that answer tight questions that feed into the main one.

A mapping rule that keeps you out of trouble: one primary page per intent. If two drafts are targeting the same intent, merge them before you publish.

Internal linking matters here, not as a “hack”, but as signposts. Readers land on one page, then follow links to learn more, compare options, or take the next step. Google also sees that structure and understands what your site is about.

Turn competitor wins into your content plan (without copying)

Finding gaps is only half the job. The other half is turning competitor wins into better pages on your own site.

When you review what’s already ranking, you’re not hunting for phrases to borrow. You’re looking for:

  • What the page does well (so you meet the basic bar)
  • What it misses (so you can beat it)

This is where you earn the click. The best pages don’t feel like essays. They feel like someone clearing a path through fog.

How to judge the top ranking pages fast (freshness, depth, and usefulness)

Give yourself five minutes per page. Use a quick checklist:

What does the page promise?
Look at the title and intro. Does it match the query, or does it wander?

How quickly does it answer?
If the page takes 800 words to get to the point, you can beat it with clarity.

Is it easy to scan?
Strong headings, short paragraphs, and clear sections usually win. People read like they’re skimming a menu.

What’s missing?
Common missing angles include pricing context, real examples, mistakes to avoid, and clear “who it’s for”.

Is any of it dated?
Old screenshots, old steps, or references to outdated tools are openings you can use.

Does it match intent?
A “how to” search wants steps and outcomes. A comparison search wants differences, trade-offs, and a decision.

One simple way to be better, without writing a novel: add a small extra that competitors skip. A checklist, a template, a short troubleshooting section, or a mini example with numbers. These tiny add-ons often get saved, linked, and shared.

Create vs update: a simple decision guide

Your gap list will include opportunities that look like “new pages”, but many are really “fix what you already have”.

Create a new page when:

  • You have no page that fits the intent.
  • Your existing page targets a different question.
  • The topic deserves a clear, focused home (and you can support it with related content).

Update an existing page when:

  • You already have a page that should win, but it’s thin, old, or messy.
  • The page ranks, but it’s stuck (often page 2 to 4).
  • The query intent hasn’t changed, but expectations have.

Watch for cannibalisation. If you publish two pages aimed at the same intent, they can steal traffic from each other. When you spot overlap, merge into one stronger page, then redirect or tidy up the weaker one.

Build a 30-day content gap sprint (and measure what changed)

A sprint keeps the work real. It turns “we should publish more” into a plan you can finish.

A practical 30-day sprint looks like this:

Week 1: Pick 3 high-impact topics
Choose topics with clear intent, clear value, and realistic competition.

Week 2: Publish or refresh 1 pillar page
Make it the best starting point in your niche. Keep it clear, not bloated.

Weeks 3 to 4: Add 2 to 4 supporting pages
Each one should answer a tight question and link back to the pillar. Add links between supporting pages where it makes sense.

Also tidy the basics on every page you touch:

  • Titles that match intent and read like a promise
  • Headings that guide skimmers
  • Simple FAQs that answer real follow-up questions

Track results weekly. Don’t obsess over daily movement. Watch for:

  • Ranking shifts for the target cluster
  • Search impressions and clicks
  • Time on page (as a rough “did this help?” signal)
  • Conversions (sign-ups, leads, saves, whatever matters)

Then repeat a lighter version every quarter. Competitors keep publishing, and new questions appear as tools, rules, and habits change.

Conclusion

Content gap analysis is simple when you keep it human. Find your real search competitors, pull the gap list, filter hard, group into topics, then publish better answers than what’s already ranking.

The sites that win aren’t louder. They’re more helpful, more current, and easier to read. Choose one topic area today, run the steps, and set a quarterly reminder so your site keeps lighting up those dark windows.

- Advertisement -
Share This Article
Leave a Comment