Two-Tier Justice: Govt to Override Sentencing Council
Summary
In a significant shake-up of the UK’s criminal justice system, the government has unveiled plans to override the Sentencing Council — the independent body responsible for developing sentencing guidelines for criminal courts. The measure, widely seen as a politically motivated response to public demands for tougher sentencing, raises concerns about the balance of power between lawmakers and judicial authorities.
The proposed new powers would allow ministers to veto or amend recommendations made by the Sentencing Council, effectively enabling the government to directly influence the punishment of criminal offenders. Supporters claim this move is necessary to curb what they view as “soft justice” and ensure that sentencing reflects public expectations and safety concerns.
The initiative is seen as part of a broader law-and-order agenda spearheaded by key government figures seeking to regain voter confidence ahead of upcoming elections. It also appears to respond to widespread public dissatisfaction with perceived disparities between crimes and corresponding sentences.
Critics, including legal experts and human rights advocates, warn that the decision could result in a “two-tier justice system,” where sentences are dictated by political influence rather than legal precedent or independent judicial review.
The Sentencing Council, which was created to ensure transparency, consistency, and fairness in sentencing, has not publicly commented in depth but is expected to push back against any encroachments on its autonomy. Questions now arise about whether judicial independence can remain intact in the face of ministerial interference.
